Posts

Showing posts with the label Software Contracts

ERP SOFTWARE DISPUTES:Common Pitfalls

Good Article on ERP softtware disputes: Multinational organisations spend significant money and resources on enterprise resource planning (ERP) software, which automates processes in operations, finance and human resource. Although ERP software can be supplied off-the-shelf, many customers seek modifications or a bespoke product. The substantial cooperation necessary between the supplier and purchaser of ERP software makes it ripe for disputes. This article discusses common pitfalls to watch out for. Click  here  to access the article. https://1f2ca7mxjow42e65q49871m1-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/OutlookNewsletter_December2020.pdf  ERP SOFTWARE DISPUTES: https://www.39essex.com/december-2020-edition-of-outlook-a-roundup-of-news-and-views-from-39-essex-chambers-commercial-and-construction-group/

Negotiating Technology Contracts: On-premise vs. Cloud and Hosted Software: Good read

I found this article interesting on key contractual clauses to be considered when dealing with cloud computing contracts. There is a wrong perception prevailing that the standard boiler-plate contract clauses are applicable to digital transformation contracts. Indeed the liability, indemnity, termination and privacy clauses etc. will require careful reading and drafting to protect the interest of the parties and to suit the requirements. Please read-on the article to learn more.    Negotiating Technology Contracts: On-premise vs. Cloud and Hosted Software by Stephen F. Pinson   in  Blogs More and more businesses are considering accessing hosted software rather than purchasing on-premise software.  They are also placing data in third-party public or private clouds instead of selecting on-premise software.  This article will explain the key considerations and contractual provisions when deciding to utilize a hosted software cloud solution versus on-...

Tips on Software Audit Defense - Webinar collection

Image
Reselling Microsoft SPLA & Cloud    https://youtu.be/Fb8xYuAM9KY Software Audit Defense | A Legal Perspective    Understanding Autodesk Software Audits - what you need to know.    Published on Feb 14, 2016 http://www.SoftwareAuditLawyers.com If you have received a letter from Autodesk asking your company to submit to a “voluntary” self audit, you should watch this video from start to finish. This video will help you understand the ins and outs of how Autodesk and their attorneys handle software infringement cases. The legal and reputational risks to your organization cannot be understated. You could be facing damages from $750-$150,000 for “willful infringement” of copyright software. Your company, and its officers and directors may be labelled or accused of being a “software pirate” and if a federal copyright lawsuit is filed, serious damage to the goodwill of the business is at stake, and these can possibly emerg...

BSA Software Audit Updates: Membership Changes and Impact on Audits- Interesting read

Image
BSA Software Audit Updates: Membership Changes and Impact on Audits by Keli Johnson Swan in Blogs , BSA Audits BSA| The Software Alliance (the “BSA”) is an organization that acts on behalf of software publishers to enforce copyrights. The membership of the organization may undergo changes, which can impact an existing software audit if a member leaves during the course of the audit and the BSA no longer has power of attorney to enforce the copyrights. The BSA has lost of a few members recently, including Parametric Technology Corporation (“PTC”), Minitab, and TechSmith Corporation. Some publishers choose to enforce their own copyrights, while others elect to engage competing organizations such as the Software & Information Industry Association (“SIIA”) or Software Compliance Group.  Recently, the BSA also gained new members, including DataStax, Salesforce, Splunk, and Workday. The changes to the BSA’s membership may affect the scope of the audit,...

Responding to Software Review Audits- Good tips on how to handle audit requests and settlements

Image
Managing Audits to Prevent Unauthorized Disclosures by Technology Teams by Keli Johnson Swan in Blogs , Software Audits Disputes involving software usage are on the rise for businesses of all sizes. In some cases, technical teams respond to a software publisher’s or a third party’s audit request and provide significant amounts of data without notifying anyone on the corporate governance or the legal teams.  It is critical for those teams to evaluate the publisher’s legal ability to audit, and to identify the data the publisher is entitled to request. It is not uncommon for the legal team to discover the existence of a software audit or license verification after the company has received a demand for damages arising from alleged over-usage of software. Often, employees responding to an audit request do not understand the request and provide inaccurate or incomplete information. Once this information is disclosed, it can expose the business to a damages...

UK Court rules licence fees payable for "indirect" use of software: Interesting read

Image
UK Court rules licence fees payable for "indirect" use of software By Emily Parris | March 2, 2017 13:57 A recent judgment from the UK's Technology and Construction Court highlights how important it is for businesses to audit their use of third party software on a regular basis and to review licence terms before implementing systems changes that could impact use of existing applications.   Over-use or use outside the scope of the licence can lead to claims against the customer for retrospective licence fees and/or damages.  In this latest case, the court ruled that under the terms of its licence, drinks company Diageo should have paid licence fees to SAP for "indirect" use of SAP software by Diageo's sales staff and customers.  This "indirect" use occurred when Diageo's sales staff and customers used new systems developed for Diageo on a Salesforce.com platform to interface with SAP software.  The judgment establishes th...

Avoid Overpaying for Software Settlements- Interesting read

Image
Avoid Overpaying for Software Settlements by Keli Johnson Swan Jan 19, 2017 Most software audits initiated by the software publisher or a third party entity authorized to pursue copyright infringement claims on behalf of the software publishers, such as the BSA| The Software Alliance (“BSA”) or the Software & Industry Information Association (“SIIA”), are resolved outside of a courtroom.  Many of the settlements require payment of a monetary penalty as part of the resolution. There are many factors that precede the negotiation stage and affect the total payment. Once a company decides to participate in the audit and submits audit results, the BSA or SIIA identify any gaps in software licensing, according to the auditing entity’s rules. These gaps may range from a deficiency of licenses to acquiring the incorrect license for the software installed. Once the auditing entity determines the number of gaps, it calculates a total settlement based on the information p...