Posts

Showing posts from 2017

Mere Physical Contact Without Sexual Overtones Would Not Amount To Sexual Harassment At Workplace

Mere Physical Contact Without Sexual Overtones Would Not Amount To Sexual Harassment At Workplace : Delhi HC [Read Judgment] BY: APOORVA MANDHANI NOVEMBER 2, 2017 1:36 PM 2.5K SHARES Change Font Size The Delhi High Court, on Tuesday, refused to ca... The Delhi High Court, on Tuesday, refused to categorize every unwelcome physical contact as sexual harassment. Justice Vibhu Bakhru explained, “Undoubtedly, physical contact or advances would constitute sexual harassment provided such physical cont... Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/mere-physical-contact-without-sexual-overtones-not-amount-sexual-harassment-workplace-delhi-hc-read-judgment/

How is IP indemnity clause drafted!

Image
IP Indemnities in commercial agreements Reference  https://www.taylorwessing.com/synapse/ti-ip-indemnities-in-commercial-agreements.html November 2016 IP indemnities tend to cause a certain amount of concern to commercial parties in the context of commercial agreements. However, when used and drafted properly, they serve a vital purpose. What is an indemnity? An indemnity is an obligation given by one party to a contract to compensate the other for some defined loss. Typically the obligation relates to a specific clause within a wider commercial agreement e.g. within an IP licence agreement. Its chief purpose is to appropriately allocate risk between the contracting parties – although the appropriateness of that risk allocation will be coloured by the bargaining position of the parties. Risk allocation However, indemnities are not the principal mode of allocating risk within a contract – warranties are. To understand the role of an indemnity it is important to fir

Digital signature on a commercial contract: Risks and its Validity

Give me a sign: what are the risks of accepting an electronic signature on a commercial contract? If your business accepts a commercial contract that has been signed electronically, there is a risk that the contract will not be enforceable against the person that had allegedly signed it if the electronic signature was applied without authority. To combat this risk, you may consider sending the electronically signed document back to the party that allegedly signed it to obtain their separate confirmation that they had in fact considered the document and applied their signature electronically. Recent contract law case This use of electronic signatures in contracts was recently considered by the New South Wales Court of Appeal [1] . Briefly, the facts of the case are: Williams Group Australia Pty Ltd ( Williams ), a supplier of building materials, approved a credit application which was electronically signed by IDH Modular Pty Ltd ( IDH ) using a technology called HelloFax.

All about Indemnity

Image
Indemnities and commercial  contracts    What is an ‘indemnity’ and when is a Council likely to come across one? An indemnity clause is often found in commercial contracts. In traditional legal language, it is a promise to ‘hold harmless’ the other party, should a particular event occur. An example of where a Council might come across such a clause is in its procurement contracts (where the Council may ask the other party to give indemnities). An indemnity means making good any relevant loss that arises. The event typically includes a breach of the relevant agreement – but it might also extend to other events, including events over which the indemnifying party has no control. For the party receiving the benefit, it is rather like being insured against the loss. It is therefore obviously a very serious obligation. When considering an indemnity, you are really looking at a risk allocation issue: the party giving the indemnity is being asked to assume the risk of particular ev

Top 20 Do's and Don'ts for Outsourcing - The Service Provider Perspective

Top 20 Do's and Don'ts for Outsourcing - The Service Provider Perspective Published on June 2, 2017 Partner at DLA Piper I previously posted the top 20 do's and don'ts for outsourcing transactions from a customer/buyer perspective; obviously there are two sides to every story, so it is only fair to complete the picture with the service provider view of the world! Top 20 Do’s and Don’ts for Outsourcing Deals- the Supplier Perspective Do ensure that you have a properly constituted deal team from day one This will mean people who understand the numbers, those that grasp the wider commercial arrangements, the right technical people, legal people, a really good “deal lead” who will face off to the customer….and don’t forget the actual delivery team! Don’t ever say that a deal is “must win” Obviously there are projects that would be extremely good to win and also extremely painful to lose….but a bad deal will be bad news for years to come Do understa

How to handle contract risk and mitigation of the risk- Good read!

Image
The Contract Said What? Buffering Employees from Contract Risk By Spiwe L. Jefferson  |  2017-May-30   After issuing communications training and killing text messages that created contractual obligations for the company, our fictitious legal team at Sunderland Manufacturing thought they addressed their last issue at the intersection of employee behavior and litigation risk. Unfortunately, more problems point to a different area of risk worse than the last.   "B arry, we have a problem,” said Jason Parks to Barry Miles, deputy general counsel of Sunderland Manufacturing. Jason was Sunderland’s trial counsel, discussing a multi-million dollar wrongful death suit by the estate of a plaintiff who allegedly died when his Sunderland pacemaker failed. “Did our pacemaker malfunction?” Barry inquired. “No,” said Jason. “Did we fail to instruct the hospital on its use?” Barry asked. “No,” said Jason

Supreme Court rules on special judges' power under Prevention of Corruption Act-Interesting read

Image
Supreme Court rules on special judges' power under Prevention of Corruption Act Newsletters May 30 2017 | Contributed by Shardul Amarchand Mangaldas & Co Introduction In a recent judgment rendered in HCL Infosystem Ltd v CBI, (1) the Supreme Court dealt with the question of whether a special judge designated to deal with cases under the Prevention of Corruption Act 1988 is empowered to try offences which do not fall within the act. This question arose in the context of an investigation into the National Rural Health Mission (NRHM) scam. In the case at hand, the Supreme Court held that the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973 applies to trials before a special judge and that there is no prejudice to a trial before a special judge duly appointed to oversee cases that fall under the Prevention of Corruption Act if the object of doing so is to try connected cases before the same court. Facts The NRHM, an initiative undertaken b