Penalty Clause: Even if Penalty is harsh and damaging, it needs to be proportionate and therefore enforceable

-

 Penalty clause VAR: “extremely harsh” but still enforceable

11 March 2021 - Post by:


The court in Permavent v Makin determined that although the provision before it was “extremely harsh” it was not “out of all proportion” to the claimants’ legitimate business interests and so was not an unenforceable penalty.

Makin and Yeremeyev had operated a business which supplied roofing products to the construction industry through several companies, including Permavent and Greenhill. Makin invented roofing products under the name “Easy Roof System”, a number of which he successfully patented.

Following the breakdown of the relationship between the business partners, Makin left the business and terminated the patent licenses to Permavent. Permavent brought initial proceedings against Makin claiming that it was the owner of the relevant patents and a settlement agreement was reached. Under the settlement agreement Makin would receive a number of payments in exchange for which he agreed not to claim an interest in any of the intellectual property rights which had been assigned to Greenhill. Makin subsequently breached this agreement and Permavent sought to invoke the alleged penalty clause under the settlement agreement.

Per Cavendish v Makdessi, a penalty for breach of a party’s primary obligation becomes unenforceable should it be “unconscionable”, “extravagant” and/or “exorbitant” in relation to the legitimate business interests of the party who has suffered the loss or damage. The court concluded that although the detriment was harsh and damaging it was proportionate and therefore enforceable against Makin.

Some of the key factors the court considered were as follows:

  1. Makin’s aggressive and abusive behaviour prior to entering into the settlement agreement;
  2. the quantum of the claimants’ anticipated loss compared to the quantum of the penalty;
  3. the fact Makin entered into the settlement agreement having obtained legal advice; and
  4. the purpose of the relevant clauses in seeking to protect against the damage to the business of the claimants more widely, and not just to the value of the IP rights.
Ref. http://www.aocompactcontract.com/penalty-clause-var-extremely-harsh-but-still-enforceable/

Comments

Post a Comment

Please share your valuable comments and thoughts on this article. Thanks!

Popular posts from this blog

Responding to Software Review Audits- Good tips on how to handle audit requests and settlements

-
Image
Managing Audits to Prevent Unauthorized Disclosures by Technology Teams by Keli Johnson Swan in Blogs , Software Audits Disputes involving software usage are on the rise for businesses of all sizes. In some cases, technical teams respond to a software publisher’s or a third party’s audit request and provide significant amounts of data without notifying anyone on the corporate governance or the legal teams.  It is critical for those teams to evaluate the publisher’s legal ability to audit, and to identify the data the publisher is entitled to request. It is not uncommon for the legal team to discover the existence of a software audit or license verification after the company has received a demand for damages arising from alleged over-usage of software. Often, employees responding to an audit request do not understand the request and provide inaccurate or incomplete information. Once this information is disclosed, it can expose the business to a damages cla
Read more

"What is the right thing to do?" What's The Difference Between Compliance And Ethics?

-
Image
  What's The Difference Between Compliance And Ethics? Bruce Weinstein, Ph.D. Contributor Customized ethics keynotes, training, and online courses for CE credit May 9, 2019, 01:19pm EDT  TWEET THIS High-character leaders ask, "What is required of me?" but they don't leave it at that. Ethical leaders also ask, "What is the right thing to do? How would an honorable person behave in this situation?" I've noticed some confusion about the roles that ethics and compliance play in organizations. This confusion arises, in part, from the way these two fields are identified. Some companies have only a compliance department. Others have a compliance  and  ethics (or ethics and compliance) department. Some companies have a Chief Ethics Officer separate from compliance. To get some clarity on these crucial roles, I asked seven leaders who are involved in both ethics and compliance to explain the similarities and differences as they saw them. I'll present their vi
Read more

Influencers in the workplace: Can promotional work on social media be regarded as moonlighting?

-
Image
  Lawtons Africa Jun 9, 2023 4 min read Influencers in the workplace: Can promotional work on social media be regarded as moonlighting? Author: Andile Mphale– Candidate Attorney Supervised by: Lavery Modise– Consultant https://www.lawtonsafrica.com/post/influencers-in-the-workplace-can-promotional-work-on-social-media-be-regarded-as-moonlighting The use of social media has many benefits; one of them being the creation of work and income opportunities, such as doing promotional work on social media. Promotional work on social media has also given rise to the term “influencer”. An influencer is someone with a substantial following or a notable online presence, who can influence potential consumers into purchasing a product or service through social media endorsements or recommendations and receive a reward for that. There are influencers who do promotional work on social media on a full-time basis and make a living from it. There are also influencers who do promotional work on social med
Read more