Patent Law Doesn’t Need To Recognize AI Inventors
Patent Law Doesn’t Need To Recognize AI Inventors by Hodan Omaar June 25, 2020 AI-generated inventions do not exist, at least not in the eyes of the law. Earlier this year, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) rightly rejected two patent applications that named an AI system as inventor making clear its position to limit inventorship only to human beings, even when it is an AI system that is functionally inventing. The AI inventor at the heart of this case is DABUS, an AI system that mimics the neural patterns of the human mind to independently combine basic concepts into a complex idea that it can self-identify as original. Stephen Thaler, who created DABUS, listed the AI system as the inventor of two ideas; interlocking food containers that are easy for robots to grasp and a warning light that flashes in a rhythm that is hard to ignore. Thaler argues that the law should recognize DABUS, rather than him, as the inventor of these ideas because crediting a